Objective
        Writing critiques will help you develop critical thinking and
          teach you how to evaluate and extract deep understanding from
          original research papers.
        Reading
        You should expect to read for one to four hours for each week
          and to think and write for an additional hour or two to
          develop an interesting critique. Your emphasis should be on
          the innovation and insights that the papers provide and the
          avenues of new research that these papers pave.
        Format
        Critiques are due at the beginning of the class. If you are
          presenting and leading the discussion, you are not required to
          write a critique.
        
         Your critique should not exceed two pages and must reflect
          on what you learned and thoughts provoked by the paper. The
          critique must includes a short summary of the paper, but most
          of it should be based on your original thoughts about the
          paper, what you learned form the paper, and your new ideas
          provoked by the paper. Please seek concision and clarity and
          avoid unnecessary commentary. Your and my time is priceless!
          Make sure that you use an active voice in your critique.
         The following specific format is required. 
        
          -  Please submit your readings on gradescope. You can join the class with the entry code: GEPE4K
-  First, set the stage and start with a paragraph (quarter
            page) that states the problem addressed in the paper,
            describes the proposed solution, and summarizes the insights
            resulting from the empirical study. 
- Second, state the strength(s) of the paper in one to three
            sentences. 
- Third, state the weakness(es) of the paper in one to three
            sentences. 
- Forth, include two of the following and discuss
            each in a separate paragraph:
            
              -  What future research directions should be explored?
-  What ideas or thoughts the provokes? 
-  What potential impact does it have on the field?
-  Why will the papr be cited?
-  What questions remain open?
-  What experiments can provide deeper understanding
                about the work?
-  How does it relate and extend the previous research?
-  Why the work in not interesting?
-  In which situations the approach will work or will
                not work?
-  How can your own research be mixed with the insights
                provided in the paper?
-  Other interesting analyses and commentary. 
 
Grading
        I will evaluate your critiques on a ten-point scale. You can
          also get a bonus point; however, I expect most critiques to
          receive a ten.
        
          -  Required sections (8 points): summary (1 point),
            strengths (1 point), weaknesses (1 point), analytical
            discussion (each 2.5 point). 
-  Grammar and spelling (1 point). 
-  Clarity and grace, i.e., clear, well organized arguments
            in well organized paragraphs (1 point).
-  Deep analysis and/or surprising me with a really
            interesting idea (1 bonus point). 
Late policy
        For each assigned paper, critiques are due at the beginning
          of the corresponding class. I will not accept late critiques,
          except in the case of illness.
        Reading material for writing critiques